Showing posts with label EPPP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EPPP. Show all posts

Friday, 20 October 2017

12 Rules for FA Youth Football


I applaud the people that constantly search for a better way of developing players and ultimately aim to improve our national team’s results in major tournaments. So I was very interested to see this latest FA 12 Rules as a result of the youth review.
The overall objective of this review was outlined as follows.

To make football ‘calmer and safer’. I don’t think any person would argue with that being something that should be under constant ongoing review.
They want to create the ‘right environment for faster development’.  Ok, faster development could accelerate learning and maybe have a better end product. Only thing I would say is there isn’t a fast way to reach 21 years old. Ultimately, that will take 21 years.
The rules will ‘encourage player to be more skilful’.  I’m happy with that. Provided we understand and identify appropriate skill. For example, I love to see a player that can pass the ball with amazing detail in what he or she can do with its movement, like a golf or cue ball. Skill to me is much more ranging than simply 1v1 step overs and flip flaps.
They want to make matches ‘more competitive’. Great news. Always baffles me how we sanitise competition. Although government now has U turned thankfully and encourages competition in school PE for example. I’m glad about that because children are instinctively competitive. Anyone that has watched their children playing Fifa on Playstation like me can vouch for that. They want to win, then in sport we remove that edge, because the surrounding parents can’t control themselves.

So the rules…

Calmer & Safer
-          Silent Sidelines Rule:- There is nothing worse than hearing aggressive mums and dads shouting out obscene language. Even recently in my academy role a keeper made a really bad mistake. He’s U11. Several parents on the opposition hailed out cackling laughing at his demise and their teams gain. I found that shocking because do you need a rule to just make you a decent person? Having said that is there anything wrong with people shouting “unlucky”, “go on”, “well played”, “good tackle” etc.? It’s now the over sanitisation that does concerns me because then later on when you can’t control the spectator output then the players could freeze rather than learn to block it out and focus. Anyway, I guess its thanks to the like of what I witnessed a couple of weeks ago that this has to come in. I just wish we hit the problem head on, explain to them, “come on, if that was your son in goal, subjected to that, crying on the way home with embarrassment, how would you feel”? On that day there was circa 50 people there, 2 did that horrible thoughtless stupid shouting and 48 more pay the price.
-          Slide Tackle Rule:- My question here would be what medical grounds? Of course there is a risk playing football as with any others. A sliding tackle isn’t exactly encouraged and I’ve never heard a coach ask a player to do it. I think it’s an instinctive reaction to needing to reach the ball when defending and something that needs to be practiced to get right. It’s a form of tackling, maybe one that sometimes goes wrong but in over a 1,000 youth games I’ve never seen a significant injury from this. I’ve seen plenty of players left on the floor and beat and also seen a few good tackles. In adult football of course I’ve seen horror tackles. Just not sure if this is a rule for rules sake.
-          Blue Card Rule:- I’m actually a big fan of the sin bin rule. But the rule could be better in my view. I think in over 1,000 youth games I’ve only ever seen a small handful of booking’s in youth foundation phase grass roots football. I think that’s because the young people are on the whole not sinister in their actions. What I don’t like though is the imitation of the top premier league players and in particular arguing with the referee. We introduced a zero tolerance of even disagreeing with the referee in our own game Fiitball and it worked. Players leave the pitch for 2 minutes and it fixes the problem in a matter of minutes. Teachers said to us that certain players completely changed their usual persona in game situations. I think the sin bin rule for the current set of rules means it will have little affect with the little ones only to actually encourage more ‘bookings’.
-          Respect Marks Rule:- Why not? I don’t mind this and would only be an issue for those not able to control their emotions I guess.

More Skilful
-          Retreat Line Rule:-  I support this and where I have seen it I think it works well to encourage players to get on the ball. It needs more thought though and I’m shocked that it’s one of only two items to make players more skilful. For example I’ve seen this where the centre back gets it, then that player kicks it forward. So, it defeats the object. Also players get better under pressure, so at some point it should be encouraged to work on finding space and improving first touch under pressure. Plus if the keeper never kicks it then he/she is not developing. For example to practice chipping to pass to someone. That isn’t long ball to gain territory.  Thinking completely off the cuff, there could be more realistic ideas that actually help develop players to work off the ball and develop with pressure. Could you mark the pitch into 3 zones? You get two goals counted if you have a player in your team touch the ball in all three zones and score before you lose possession. In an elite environment I would certainly prefer that because I want my players to learn to deal with opposition.
-          Pass back Rule:- I agree and I have heard grass roots managers saying that it shouldn’t apply. I think it’s better to get the children into good habits as early as possible. I agree therefore that this helps the goalkeeper also. But I would take this as a given as it’s consistent with the full rules and to not have it included would not sit right with me. So, I’m not sure where the innovation is here.

Faster Development
-          No Instructions Rule:- I do agree that players do learn better thinking for themselves and coming up with answers to problems and challenges. I now have my own private academy team playing in an U11 and we set them a challenge for each player every week which is a progression of the training topic. The subs then acknowledge every time they achieve that objective and it’s tallied up at the end and openly recorded. We find that this is working and beats bellowing instructions. We may occasionally ask them to think about possible different outcomes or ask them to remember the challenge. That’s about it.
-          Equal Playing Time Rule:- 100% Agree and we have always done this. There is nothing worse than seeing players on the side-line freezing and its worth remembering that players develop at different rates so you could be denying time for a player that could end up being very strong and have further potential. Added to this, recently I was working for a pro academy playing a development centre against a grass roots team and we had 7 players on the side-line. The other team also had a similar number. I said to the coaches, there is a quarter of a pitch over there, spin the goals round and let the kids play on their own. I think we over supervise the children and sometimes over coach. There’s two goals, there is a ball, go and play. The pitch is fenced off. If someone gets hurt they will call us and we can see them in the distance anyway. What are the rules? Who is the ref? Who’s in goal? What is the formation? What decisions do they make? Well do you supervise when they play the PlayStation? No, and no one supervised them playing on the playground either. They sorted it out themselves. For me, subs should be set up in a safe, small game. Much better to play than stand around!
-          All Positions Rule:- I agree that players are ‘pigeon holed’ too quickly and it’s good to try different roles and responsibilities. Even when they get older and certain attributes lend themselves better to certain positions it can still be really useful to try different positions to challenge them. Early on players should be learning core aspects of the game with the ball in ongoing 1v1 situations all over the pitch. Later on they can learn position specific attributes that affect decisions and tactical methods.

More Competition
-          Mixed Teams Rule:- Not wishing to just throw away an idea without rational consideration, but I feel that this is just nonsense and I’ll try to explain why. Well firstly with the work I do in schools there is an obvious gulf in ability within most classrooms. An environment that puts different abilities in core subjects on separate tables or even in different rooms to ensure they share the similar level of development speed and so they can be suitably challenged in order to maximise their potential in that subject. This is clearly evident when you take a class to do PE and that includes football. There is an obvious gulf in physical and technical ability and it makes it very difficult to effectively coach where the lower ability pupils are gaining satisfaction and healthy participation levels whilst the higher ability group are suitably challenged to help them improve. For me this is a very similar situation in football and working as an advisor at different clubs I have seen this first hand when the groups are mixed together. You simply cannot achieve desired outcomes that is good for either end of the scale. Your ability level of the group dictates the level of the session and your set expectations. I think this can lead to disappointment for the players that feel like they are not involved enough and don’t achieve the expected outcome. Players refusing passes etc and them having little success in possession because they are picked off too easily. There are different levels of ability in sport just like there is in other core topics and this takes us back years. It totally undermines the ‘faster development’ objective and more importantly completely undermines the whole elite player performance plan. The EPPP is set out to ensure stronger players get to the better equipped academies and play with and against better opposition thus giving them a so called better chance of success. Surely this applies further down the food chain. Better players could just go stale and don’t have to put too much effort in or challenge themselves greatly. That also makes it harder for scouts to identify the true better talent because they will just be dominating games. Some clubs may well have separate teams of equal ability and typically you see them called reds/greens, tigers/panthers etc. But to make the mixed ability a ‘rule’ concerns me greatly and could end up benefiting neither player at either end of the spectrum.
-          Power Play Rule:- Another very concerning rule. This seems like another rule to counter a bad one in the first place. What I mean by that is if you don’t put competitive teams in similar levels in the same league and class everyone as equal than this will happen and again holds back the advanced players. No one wants teams getting beat 10 nil every week but it’s why teams have to be assessed, graded and pitched together. Some managers could also get to 3 goals and then encourage a striker not to score. Sounds ludicrous but I can see that happening all day long. Having expressed concern over this I have actually done this of my own accord. Our academy centre of excellent team went 4-0 up quickly against a grass roots team and I just took one of my players off. Because I recognised that as much as I don’t see the point of humiliating the opposition, my players are getting absolutely nothing out of it. So I wanted to try and even up the ability advantage. At least we may gain something. In another academy I also played a grass roots team and quickly set playing rules for my players for the same reason. So I’ve actually done this myself, however, making it a rule in grass roots makes it open to being abused and become unrealistic. Much better for me to pitch teams together than can compete and challenge each other. Reality of football, reality of all sport and indeed life.
-          Equal Numbers Rule:- Absolutely 100% To me is more a concern that it needs to be a ‘rule’ surely that’s decency and common sense?

Overall, I agree with some of the rules. Some I think are more common sense and with the odd bit of nonsense chucked in for good measure. Always the way though overall, the vast majority of decent people and parents pay the price for the idiotic senseless minority. We don’t really tackle the real issues head on, instead we change the rules for everyone.

I guess it keeps people in jobs as well though, so well done the FA. I understand this is also being trialed in Manchester so I guess, lets see what the feedback is. Lets give change a chance.

@antmccool7



Sunday, 20 November 2016

Week 45 - Arthritis time, EPPP and the EFL Trophy

For many like me, this is the time when I get a stark reminder of all the operations iv'e had on my knee. I'm sure many people can relate to the pain that comes this time of year. Of course its got nothing to do with age! I had been to Northampton Town V Harrow Borough on the Saturday. Great to catch up with Mick Harford there. We spoke about Luton Town and the crop of talent there. Exciting times for Luton I feel. I have to say its really refreshing. Harrow Borough going two goals behind early on of course quickly sealed this games fate. It was cold as well, at half time around me there was a collective groan of pain as all the scouts got up for the half time coffee! 
Monday
Doing our weekly training at a school in Hertfordshire where we coach a real diverse range of abilities. Something I really love about this is one of the children's granddads comes along to watch. Iv'e been in grass roots and have experienced some parents and grandparents shouting and sideline coaching. But I think we all need reminding sometimes how special it is that they come and support. We call him the Director of Football! I think we are too quick to dismiss people on over the top policies. Hes a top man!
In the evening I did a session at our level one recruitment satellite training center. I really do buy into the training methods. All geared around sessions that look like real football. Something I think the lads really enjoy more as well. Had a discussion with the local guys there about some of the great English players that have come from the areas around Brent and what attributes they demonstrated which gave them the edge to kick on. Lots of comment about desire and hunger. Funny how that always comes up?
Tuesday
Its ironic, the next day in school football we are having a discussion with the boys and girls about behavior and attitude. I start to think, is desire and and hunger in you? Technical/Tactical development can 100% be coached. What about desire and hunger? I certainly think we can effect enthusiasm with competitive games and sessions.
In the evening I nipped over to Stevenage V Southend to look at players. Was a bit deserted and its no secret that this EFL tournament needs review. I certainly see pros and cons.
Wednesday
Wembley 2009 After JPT Final  
Interesting driving to Reading U23 v Yeovil in the EFL Trophy listening to talksport where the topic was EPPP. I was a bit disappointed to have to go in the game and missing it so I did catch up later. I think the guys spoke very well and have real good arguments for change. We couldn't leave things as they were and the facilities and resource now at the disposal of the big clubs is tremendous. 
I split the key areas in to three that I feel still need to be reviewed. 1. Grassroots to Elite pathway and 2. EPPP environment 3. Elite Development pathway to 1st team.
1. Grassroots to Elite
-  No contracts for any players under 11. Just a free registration. 
- No restrictions on where they play and what sport they participate in. With a 1:200 chance at a club it's a moral crime to deny a child wider sporting memories
- Reduced controlled contact. The children are too tired
- Address the pay to play culture. Talent is lost in schools as they cant afford to travel to academies or even the subs for a grass roots team. Set up FA regional elite centers that are fully funded. Schools can then send unattached selected players for free.
- Change and enforce restrictions on scouting bonus systems. Short term bonus cannot work. If all the incentive is on new players some existing talent could get squeezed out. Also no bonus for early signing of scholars and 1st year pros.
- Clubs should have a sign and release committee. 
- Zero tolerance to recruitment based on ethnic background. If a player meets the target criteria then they are given the opportunity
- Recruit balanced players of ranging attributes. Not one style (Messi)
2. EPPP Environment
- Players are turning up hungry or eating rushed meals, siblings negatively affected, parents risking work issues to meet times. Escalating fuel and travel costs, players falling asleep in class. We need to review the contact hours relevant to age.
- 20-40% loss of education contact hours on a 1:200 chance. That is career changing and morally outrageous. 
- Quality of coaches reduced due to some walking away due to pressures of low income and hours required to record data on computer systems that are unreliable. 
- Endless repetieve player reports on players that few consider in final decisions and sometimes serve to add huge pressure to the players. Huge amounts of subjective information that will have little effect on development and decisions.
- Changing senior academy staff and heads of coaching which affects club philosophies and whole ethos. Academy managers should be on four year contracts. If they don't want a four year contract then it maybe clear they are using the role as a pathway to something else. This is not healthy for a clubs and its young players.
I recently spoke to a '3rd year scholar' at a club who said to me. "Im so bored, its like school" 
3. Elite Development pathway to 1st team.
I have to say, I do feel this is the most challenging for the guys that run our game. They have trialed the EFL Trophy and I dont think anyone really supports the outcome of that. Loaning out players still serves up the best pathway in my mind but the trouble now is that the clubs have trawler fished so much of the talented lads that they have them in stock piles and no where to go. Something that goes back to the youth development phase. Sometimes players are better left where they are to learn their trade, break into the first team. Become a professional then progress back that way. The other problem with the huge numbers in the very sanitised route is that many seem cocooned in the fantasy world in which they have operated and maybe that is why they are left shell shocked and unable to cope with the real world.

In this country we have over 100 full-time professional football clubs. That in its self is a huge unique situation that we can boast about and could surely utilise better? 
Those 100+ pro clubs make up 5 national leagues.What other countries can boast this? One thing is certain to me. A footballers successful pathway is still unproven. Those that get there probably got there because fate took them on the journey that worked for them, not because one way works over an other. Players will always come via non-league, its very reasonable to suggest that its not an error that they were missed by the pro games recruitment, its more likely that's what worked for their development. Had they been in the 'system' it could be that they would have failed, like most do. Equally those within a level 1 academy and make it, well done, clearly they were on the correct pathway for them. Or thirdly being loaned down the ladder to learn the trade. In my mind, all three of these methods work at times and all three fail, at times. But we need all three. It seems however that there is growing disregard for the smaller clubs and perception that only the top eppp level 1 clubs have the formula to produce players. That is enormously incorrect based on fact and 100% dangerous to our games future in my opinion.
This is the best football country in the world, if only we could recognise the features that make it great, embrace them instead of trying to disown them as they are maybe a threat somehow to the Premier League 'Corporation'.
Friday
I went to England v Scotland which I was very excited about. Watching Stones up close started another series of questions in my mind. Mainly, is he still then classed as professional development phase? Even though this is a competitive international at Wembley Stadium in front of 90,000 against Scotland? I think there can be no doubt the increased level of technical ability is a huge credit to the culture of his youth upbringing. But is it now a mindset thing to get him to understand that to have a great 1st touch and 1v1 capabilities under pressure which can get you out of trouble, doesn't mean you should constantly do things to put you IN trouble to demonstrate it?
I also have to point out that I was sat near the guy that was drunk out of his mind and videos emerged in the press of his bloodied face and torn shirt. I also read that this was a brawl between Scotland and England. I walked past all the guys and not sure if anyone in Scotland speaks with a cockney accent?
Saturday
Saturday morning was great. A private coaching clinic with some little guys at a great club in Hertfordshire. It feels great to share some experience although we were quick to tell them how we are always learning also. That's the nature of this coaching thing, we are all in it together. 
My week was rounded off with a visit to MK Dons against Walsall. Good to say hello and I hope they keep scrapping for much needed points. I avoided all the temptation around the ground to go home hungry and have a family meal to wrap my week up...a busy one!

Monday, 26 October 2015

Talent ID - Scouting with a metal detector

Jamie Vardy non league to Premier League top scorer
So it seems that the can of worms opened at Fifa has turned into a hidden cave of worms. So, whilst our own FA makes clear its disassociation from the deep deceit for personal gain, I wanted to pose them questions about TalentID. I’m certain that as they promote honesty, integrity and transparency the key people there will welcome the concept that we should continue to review and take care of our own house first and do what’s good for football.
They have a new Talent ID department delivering courses to professionalise recruitment of players. Like most things delivered by the FA, some we will agree with, some we won’t. Introducing overlapping coaching courses like Youth Modules for example could be deemed overkill by a sceptic but actually, having been on them I have found them to be excellent and would highly recommend coaches of any qualifications complete them. It’s good to always think, consider, and reconsider how you do things. I’ve now seem some of the results of the new Talent ID filter into my inbox. Again, a lot of it is really well structured and important. As pro clubs they are all now talking DNA and key features or pillars that players must display in order to be ‘scouted’. However, all the documents, PowerPoint, flipcharts aside, I think there are bigger and much more important issues to address when it comes to ‘Talent ID’
1.       Has England lost out on potential talent that was released from Academies for reasons other than their football ability?
2.       Our football culture has changed to include great facilities in hard up areas, but a pay to play situation which rules out heaps of children that can’t afford to take part.
The hottest player in the country today is Jamie Vardy. Yet another player that has come back into the game via non-league. Something I truly admire. In fact many players in the football league have come via that route. Some could argue development is more real post 16 when games become more realistic than the 21’s governed by the Premier League. There has been all sorts written over the last few days about clubs interested in Vardy but I couldn’t help tracing back his pathways. Surely Sheffield Wednesday must be kicking themselves. Surely someone in that club made a huge mistake. Had they not made that mistake that great club could now be sitting on a winning lottery ticket as QPR found when Sterling moved from Liverpool to Man City. So why did a club, who spent years of investment and effort let that lottery ticket blow out of the window? Mistakes happen, sometimes we get it wrong and I’ve seen high profile people very humbled when proven wrong, but with no malice either side. It was just an opinion and one that got away. That happens. But was this the case with Vardy?  I genuinely don’t know the exact ins and outs but I was left scratching my head, how? Really? A future England player, Premier League top scorer? Really? That player was let go? Considering some players I see get signed, surely this lad should have been locked tightly under contract at Sheffield Wednesday. So, as Talent ID I really want to know, how and why was this player allowed to drift out of the game. Yes, he’s done the unthinkable but let’s be honest, the vast majority don’t. They are destroyed and in some cases out of the game at all levels forever. Ok, so, most will be the right decision, but are their more Jamie Vardys?
To repeat, I DONT KNOW what happened to Jamie Vardy at Sheffield Wednesday. It could be a very genuine mistake in judgment. But it's his recent rise to the top that alerted me to the problem and I think it makes it worth investigating.
Iv’e seen players signed and released from clubs for what I believe to be the wrong reasons. This can be to hit performance targets. This can be to achieve a perceived success in recruitment for signing quotas. To show a success story to EPPP inspectors & club owners. But perhaps the most alarming question asked by many people in football is. Are players getting released and new ones signed to assist in scouts and middle management achieving bonus commissions? Many of the recruitment team will be on individual bonus schemes and also the middle and senior management. So there is an incentive to move players on and bring new ones in. This may seem cynical. Many good scouts out there and management of academies have been rewarded financially on success. Most of this is rightly earned as they are mostly underpaid and this justifies the miles put in. The problem is, like money does it can also bring out the worst in people. I believe there are now people going into clubs on a short term strategy to take as much money out as possible. Like all money grabbing leaches they turn in into drug hungry self-centred blinkered crusaders that will trample over everyone in their path for a pound note. If that means getting rid of players regardless of ability so be it. That includes any staff that might be on to them or challenge the strategy. The reality is it benefits no one other than a short term financial gain for the scout/staff. The player going out could be a Jamie Vardy and the player coming in might not be at that level giving up on alternative education and career. But people move jobs before anything is highlighted taking with them their bonus payments. This has to stop. Actually club owners put their trust in people but they need to dig down to look for this phenomenon and fix it. It’s costing them money.
Together with our new ‘play to pay’ culture I detailed here http://tonymccool.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/exclusive-football.html I fear that we can be missing out on talent who come from difficult backgrounds. These players who can’t afford to join clubs due to travel and subs. The FA have introduced all these wonderful new 3G pitches but in many cases they remain locked and empty at low peak times. Primarily these have been funded by outside organisations that promote inclusion in sport so these should be made available to local communities in a subsidised way.
There would be many things you could introduce as an academy manager but I think changes and influences need to come from above that. Here is my short manifesto that I would truly believe would produce better players, would protect football clubs better and would protect young players better.
Non contracts and reduced hours at Foundation phase
Recently I have heard of 6 year olds getting tapped up by clubs. This has got to stop. Young children should be enjoying playing football in the park without restriction. I think the value of school football, participation in multi sports and grass roots football out way the benefits of too much structured coaching under 10 years old. From the ages 8-11 I believe players should not be contracted and restricted in other activities. If asking for non-contracts is not achievable then we should look to change the hours of pro club contact and actively embrace the player taking part with grass roots clubs, school football and other sports. It was reported recently that a player has a 1 in 200 chance of making the first team. So surely it’s a moral crime to deny them other sporting opportunities at such a young age? Of course we can still find ways of recruiting them and securing them for clubs which could remain more structured from 12 years.
FREE non pro club development centres – FA Governed
Football has become a pay to play culture. The FA committed to installing hundreds of 3G pitches around the country as part of improving football. I welcome that. But the problem is, none of them are free. Simply opening the gates could result in damage but there is a solution which benefits everyone. Most of all England. Academy football is free, or is it? Driving to training four times a week and a long distance game on Sunday. It’s not free, so I suspect that some parents simply cannot afford to take the child to academies. Grass roots football receives no funding so a club has no choice to raise funds through sponsorship and parents. Some parents cannot afford this. So the new 3G pitch is rammed in the week in the evening where clubs can use subs to pay the bill. However, near me the two new ones are empty at weekends in the mornings. I would suggest that the FA book these and work with schools PE departments and grass roots managers to identify talent. Perhaps those that don’t play for a club at all. Those children can then come to that 3G free of charge for regular coaching and playing. Some clubs have their own development centres but many charge considerable amounts for that privilege. This free access would give us the ability to identify talent from within communities that are tough and deprived. My guess is that every year at least one player at every age group will be identified as at academy level but has been missed. They can then be routed to appropriate local academies as and when the time is right. I’m certain that the clubs would want to scout this centre anyway and if the player is good enough they will ‘find a way’ to get round financial restrictions. Maybe a bursary could be set aside to help the individual.
Review Elite Player Performance Plan
Clubs should have recruitment and release committee members. No one person, including the academy manager should have the autonomy to sign or release a player themselves. If it was my club I would want to see at least six signatures on a document from heads of departments. That includes:
The academy manager
The head of recruitment
The head of coaching
The head of relevant phase
The lead coach for that age
Sports science/medical department
(Possibly a first team coach depending on scale of club. Or 21s coach)
Equally, I would want to see a similar document on file with the six votes that agree the player should be released. This would be the result of a ‘release meeting’ where each players attributes and potential is discussed. Then the vote and recorded. Only then can the Academy Manager have the casting vote if required. After all, the club has been forking out £3-4k+ a year to develop this child. We also took him out of school. His parents have spent £100 a week driving him to training. He’s sacrificed all his other activities he used to take part in and is too tired to even do his homework or falling asleep in class (I heard this happen). The least we can do is take his release seriously? Of course it’s a necessary evil. Breaking a child’s heart is something I don’t take part in with ease. Some players just don’t develop and actually it’s for their own good long term. We can’t be 100% certain that we are right but let’s carefully consider everything before it’s another investment down the drain of the club and potential loss of essential future income. As well as a heartbroken child that didn’t need it.
I would also look into hours and pressure put on the child and parents. This should be age appropriate and if children come in during the day I would want to huge commitment by the staff to make this valuable. Also any child behind at school should not be able to come in on day release. Of course it’s not relevant to level 1 academies who provide the education.
EPPP follows the education format. This includes setting out learning objectives and outcomes. As well as this 6 week reporting and player meetings. Many parents want more information, so in that respect it’s good. But the problem I have is this. I don’t know a player yet that has been either recruited or released based on what has been written on the PMA systems. There is now all this data logged but it’s largely subjective and therefore how valuable is it? Do you really think the first team manager is going to ask to read what the U14’s coach thought of him before putting him in the first team? So, its work for works sake. Actually it applies more pressure to young players who know every mistake is logged against them and the coaches are spending hours upon hours on laptops instead of the grass. So this needs to be reviewed. I also wonder if all parents are entitled to full copies of this data under the Data Protection Act which includes access to information held about you.
New Bonus/Pay rules for Scouts
Short term bonus for scouts and bosses can’t work for the club or the player. I’m totally against it. Getting a bonus for a player signing at the academy should be disbanded. Pay the scout and pay expenses, yes. Give them performance targets, yes. But remove this bonus. Also the bonus for an academy player signing as a a scholar or first year pro. These achievements may seem huge to the player and parents at the time but they still have not reached the ultimate goal. A bonus should only come into place when the player has appeared twenty times in the first team, out on loan or sold to another club. That really proves the player had a chance and if you’re a proper scout that cares about players that is surely all you want to see? You will be happy to play the long game. I would also have a contract agreement meaning if staff get moved on, the scout will still receive the bonus. This would make individuals with the autonomy to ‘play the game’ and manipulate the system for personal gain change their strategy. Hopefully then we would find that the only players in the system are ones there on merit and merit alone. Who would disagree with that?
So for those recruiting lower down this seems like a long way away, 5 years plus before you could gain recognition. Well, yes, that’s true. But it’s for the good of the game. You get your match fee, you get your miles and we will look at the performance levels. You will be educated about what the club needs. But I’m not going to let you cash out early on an achievement, that actually, is not an achievement at all and puts the club at financial risk and can be harmful to vulnerable players.
The vast majority of people in football are good souls who care about the game and the lives they affect. That includes within the FA. Actually includes the current department set up. Those will be reading this nodding their heads. Others however with be boiling. Reading through each line to look for something liable. Maybe its fear of exposure? Maybe you have your own hidden cave? Those will be the ones checking their shoulders. But you see, what goes around comes around, just like we have seen at Fifa. Too many people in this country accept the words “that’s football”. If we truly want the game cleared up then it starts with honesty and openness. The prize for that integrity is that we might even improve our national team through better selection mixed with better development and pathways.
@antmccool7

Tuesday, 24 March 2015

Ban the competition. The FA's answer to Englands World Cup dream



Greg Dykes answer to players coming through academies only to be released and managers not picking them, is to ban the ‘competition’. I.e. ban the foreign players. When questioned on BBC Radio 4 on the 24th March 2015 he was rightly asked “Isn’t the control with the clubs who benefiting from the new Premier League TV windfall will simply go on to buy the world’s best players in order to compete?” Thus increasing the quality of the product on the pitch, thus increasing the audience base, thus increasing the TV revenue and so the cycle continues. Can’t the FA see this? Actually, why can’t the FA embrace this instead of attacking it?

How will England be better footballers if we simply ban better players? We can’t pretend these players don’t exist. The FA should be the organisation starting at the very foundation of the game that helps to increase player’s capabilities and opportunities. Would it not be far better to produce players that academies ‘don’t’ release? If they were good enough for the first team and signed for free (baring the development cost) would they release them and buy a foreigner? The difference would then be that we have a player in the 1st team that can genuinely compete in the 1st team which already contains the world’s best players. Then and only then can we expect to see an England team competing for a world cup. Can people not see that? Are England players banned from playing in Germany, Argentina, Netherlands or Brazil? Could it be that they simply are not good enough?

Would Andy Murray win Wimbledon if we banned Djokovic, Federer and Nadal? Would he win anything else?

The FA is really in a dangerous position here. One which is so critical for our futures and could leave us scratching our heads again in ten years’ time. If they can’t hear what they are proposing we are destined for failure. They have to accept now that they simply cannot take on the might of the Premier League. Money talks, times have changed. Academy football is now affectively ran by the Premier League with its EPPP system. Overall, facilities and quality of staff has mostly improved because money talks. But the FA has an over whelming overall goal. A winning / competing England team. Well we have the answer here and no other country has that. No other country has got the benefit of having the world’s majority of best players in its top league. So here’s the challenge now. I have to get my English players, into those teams. The chairman and managers will not ignore them. Why would they? Why then would Manchester City just built a brand new training ground to include its Academy? The FA are attacking foreign owners, managers and players, yet that’s the biggest message from one of the world’s richest saying, “There you go English players, here is a world class facility for your young talent to come and thrive” What does the FA do in return? Threaten to ban its ability to buy the world’s best. Which if happened, reduces the quality of the product on the pitch and then will water down the interest, then the investment will reduce and the opportunity will pass. Overall though let’s be honest, like the League 3 idea, why can’t the FA concentrate on topics it has a realistic chance of changing.

Greg Dykes other solution is the 3G pitch strategy. The idea of giving young people better sporting facilities is of course welcomed. But here is the problem. What about the people that can’t afford to use them? Across England local authority budget cuts have resulted in local playing fields being left in awful unplayable states. So the answer then is the gleaming new 3G pitch. There is one on the council estate where I grew up. 100 yards from my old house. It’s absolutely amazing. But, I have driven past around fifty times to find it bolted and empty, on a Sunday afternoon. Why? Because it cost a minimum of £35 per hour to use it. But there is a big Lottery and Sport England logo outside, this is a sport legacy from the Olympics, so why is it empty? To reduce my possible answers I drive 30 seconds to the large open playing fields where I see a number of pockets of young people trying to play football on an overgrown cow field. So how is that great for development? It has simply become a non-negotiable commercial enterprise. I even approached them and asked If I together with two ex-international footballers could use the facility as we wanted to get some young people off the street to play football. We were not afforded £0.01p discount. I paid in full for three sessions and we put on class coaching and games for 16 year old lads who turned up in droves. This was FREE for them.

I remember someone saying to me that it was well over £10,000 a year to send their child to an elite tennis centre and I remember thinking, wow, no wonder we can’t win Wimbledon. What if on floor 35 flat 120 in the high rise there is an English tennis superstar? But we will never know because she will never get the opportunity? Well football is heading down the same road. It’s becoming a pay to play culture and soon (even now) if you don’t have money you can’t take part. That will only see a decline in the talent further down the line. Football never was a middle class game. It was a game on the street where children put themselves in the mind of their hero. The houses were terraces and obstacles were defenders. Society has stopped football in the street as unacceptable risk and a nuisance. We have put signs up on every grass verge saying ‘No Football’. So they are forced to the uncut field where it’s impossible for the ball to roll. But thanks to the understanding FA. We have an answer, the glowing new 3G pitch. But it’s locked and mum hasn’t got money for food let alone football, so that’s that then. Ill juggle the ball in my bedroom. It’s like the field mouse that ends up in our house. We remove her habitat, we build house on her land, so she seeks shelter in ours only for us to trap it and kill it.

Typically over all the years of football, the best players have arrived on the scene having come from difficult backgrounds. Does that create more hunger and intrinsic desire to change your family’s life? But equally players are around that have very stable backgrounds. So, the point is, we just don’t know from what community and what background the next great player will be hiding. But for sure we certainly need to ensure we look under every stone and give everybody equal opportunity. If we create a pay to play culture this could eliminate so many people so we have to find a way.

Actually in my experience schools already do so much for sport and the Primary Sport Partnership clearly supports inclusion and participation. This is great for English sport not just football. Perhaps the answer lies there. Some of these primary schools already do great work in identifying talent. I work in one primary school and an 9 year old showed amazing talent. On quick investigation this child had not played in any organised games or clubs. Partly due to finance. Together with the school we worked to find a solution and I proudly went to watch him recently in his full kit in a game where he was breath-taking. So, could schools play a bigger role? Something also suggested by great blog writer: @The_W_Address

My idea would be that children whom teachers or coaches feel show excellence within the four corner model could be awarded FA football tokens. Then on these new 3G pitches there is organised FA (not club) led coaching & player development that means players from any background and any wealth have an equal chance of being spotted. Not just because they can afford to play. Or because they are paying for a privilege to be in a professional clubs development centres.

Overall if you want to make England better:-

·         Embrace the Premier League don’t fight it. Embrace the competition. But use them, find out what they did to get there and act on it

·         Evolve our game. Review EPPP and make it better. Investigate if it really contains the best coaches, the effects of player reports and hours and strain on players families

·         Improve the standard of recruited players. Maybe the FA to have its own “Elite Development Centre” That’s FREE and clubs can come along under certain guidelines to recruit

·         Work better to improve inclusive access to new sporting facilities. Increase participation and don’t ever let money be a reason for not benefiting from what essentially belongs to the football community in the 1st place

·         For Nick Levett’s work to be further enforced and improved even further for grass roots clubs

 

Equation:

Equal opportunities = Increased participation = Increased competition

+ Improved coaching + improved facilities + improved science

= Players that get into Premier League 1st team (on merit) / Better England Players

= World Cup?

 

@antmccool7

 

Thursday, 19 March 2015

The Football Factory


When you see an Aston Martin you see years of careful engineering tweaked time and time again from its initial creative design to the finished product in the showroom. The designers know what they want to achieve and the teams of engineers put it together. Eventually they have a product that as well as looking great has great performance and reliability. It’s fast, strong, agile, stable and most of all desirable. The biggest feature of all is that the template can then be repeated using a factory to assemble multiple versions for sale. So what has this got to do with football?

Can clubs make footballers like Aston Martin make cars?
In many ways I think of football development being perceived to be the same process. Many of us in professional football would have you believe that once in an ‘elite’ football academy you are automatically in that Aston Martin garage with an inevitable end product being the gleaming new Premier League footballer.  This way of thinking for youth players can be dangerous on a number of levels not least the subsequent effects on the players and even perhaps football on a wider scale.
I watched Lionel Messi against Manchester City in ore like everyone did and I debated with a former pro how to deal with him. If you go tight he nutmegs you, if you stand off he kills you with a pass, if you bring him down you get sent off. He must be as close as there has ever been to the ultimate un-defendable footballer. So who and how was this genius created? We have all took part in that debate and it now seems that some clubs and coaches are trying to ‘manufacture’ this player. You see, I do not believe this player would have been poor had he not been at the famous FC Barcelona. They simply gave him the stage and protection needed to develop. It’s that age old nature v nurture debate and many professional coaches will argue in favour of nurture. Coaches are the engineers for sure. They put the designer’s ideas together and carry out the work on the factory floor. But can you really guarantee rolling out top world class level footballers with a set formula? Of course, we as coaches play an absolute key part in that development, but that’s not the crucial part. Actually, many would argue the more crucial part is recruitment. The starting point has to be amazing talent.  You have to see something surely? If not then why do horse owners spend millions on thoroughbred horses? They too have amazing high tech training facilities. So can they not just get any horse and make it a race winner? I have a Labrador dog and I’m pretty certain that if I sent him to a greyhound training track for 2 years as a pup he still would not win many races.
 
There is no guarantee with human beings and football. Unfortunately once in the academy ‘factory’ many parents get caught up in the hype and believe that the Aston Martin is now on order. It’s an inevitable path that produces the Premier League product. Only to find that in the end it might be a Vauxhall Astra that rolls out the door. Nothing wrong with that but it’s not what you ordered. In some cases it might even be a broken car that no one wants. Then what? Football development is not a proven science. We get it wrong time and time again. The answer is, we just don’t know what we will see when we roll the shutters up. That is why I am so passionate about parents not getting carried away and jumping in to agree with taking their child out of school. Actually, a previous study I carried out proved that you are 40 times more likely to be a doctor than a footballer. Yet when I asked a groups of parents “Do you think your son could be a footballer”? Nearly all hands went up yet when I asked them if they think they could be a doctor, one went up.

I was discussing this topic with an amazing football person last week who was part of Arsenal when they released a young Dwight Gale at 14. He later bumped into the boy at around 17 and he told him that he had given up on football. Thankfully though he did get back into it and played at Stansted FC as a young adult. He was the best player and scored a hatful of goals. That made people notice and he repeated that at Bishops Stortford and Dagenham before moving to Peterborough United where his performances alerted Crystal Palace who spend £4.5m for the Premier League Aston Martin that wasn’t built in any factory. There is no proven science, there is no proven route. Humans are not products. It could even be considered that Dwight Gale may not have had that successful offer had he come through the new Premier League U21 system. We just don’t know. Some players seem to develop better by getting away to play more realistic football.


We understand that fishermen need to earn a living. But we also need to protect wildlife and the environment so they operate within strict restrictions. We have all seen the television series to know that in chasing those expensive prawns many other fish get caught up and discarded. No such restrictions are in place for young footballers who in some areas get caught in huge trawler nets by clubs searching for the golden gem or as I have heard many times “my meal ticket”. Previously scouts would watch many games including club and schools as well as talking to managers and teachers before committing to recommending a player to a club. Now things are different and many more players find themselves scouted early and I question if this waters down the elite level. Are there now larger volumes of players that believe they are at elite level and some parents (not all) believing they’ve cracked it, even allowing players to switch off their academic education in favour of the football dream?

Most clubs have tiered recruitment centres underneath the academy. So let’s say the academy has 120 players. Each age group may have then up to four lower levels beneath that academy level. There could be well over 500 further players then ‘feeding’ that academy and at some clubs they are paying for that privilege to be in that window of opportunity. When I meet some of these players and ask them who they play for, they don’t tell me their great grass roots club name, they tell me the name of the professional club. So their perception is that they are actually a player for that club. That amazes me on two levels. One is that for me, where is the elite then? All these players and possibly parents think they are ‘elite’. Secondly, what happened to being immensely proud of the grass roots club you played for? The root to being a professional could just as easily happen by being the best player with them. Be the best player in the school team. Be the best player in the county team or region team. It’s not all about a guarantee because you’ve got a pro club on your jumper and a coach that delivers (in some cases boring) over structured coaching. Here is perhaps a piece of sound advice. Whenever you get on any pitch, enjoy it and be the best. You never know whose watching.

It is this washed out elite level that could play such a crucial factor in players falling off the football radar at sub 20 years old. Is it because of disappointment? Is it because they always thought they were going to be a pro and didn’t make it meaning the motive was gone. We have to redirect this. You see, top pro players when asked mostly say they played because they loved it. Then something happened and they were alongside there heroes instead of seeing them from the stand or TV. Too many players are playing with the wrong motive and end goal pressure. If they played for the right reasons, then maybe even if they didn’t get a scholarship or pro contract offer they could find themselves arriving later like Dwight Gale. But if they don’t, then they can still take part in a great game that keeps them fit and gives them a break from the harsh reality of work and life. A life which perhaps might be less painful if you decide to not dump your education in the process.

Tony McCool

@antmccool7

 

 

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

They said I wasn't good enough (8 year old footballer)

Coaching in a school is tricky because the challenge is achieving effective results when there is such a range of abilities. So, yesterday I decided to put them in small teams of 4/5 and just let them play. At 8 this seemed to be the best way to get them on the ball as often as possible and then I can watch and devise a coaching plan from there.
One boy began to stand out. He happens to also be a bit silly and excitable and would be one that is a regular that requires attention. But bearing in mind my previous blog about eccentric behaviour its worth looking beyond that. http://tonymccool.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/is-eccentric-sign-of-bad-behaviour.html
He was addressing the ball with all surfaces, beating people easily, passing & receiving with excellent technique. He seemed predominantly right footed. Then a ball came across his body in the air, he adjusted his body, arched his back and half volley scissors kicked the ball with laces into the top corner...with his left foot. Now I want to find out more. I called him out and asked him a favour. There was a ball behind the goal and I asked if he could go get it and kick it to me. Really I was interested in which foot he used. He chipped and curled it back with his left foot. But, he spent most of the game on his right. I found another opportunity and began a little game one on one. We played a little passing game. I passed the ball to him and he should pass it back to me. Which ever foot was closer he would receive on and he would pass it with the other. He was equally comfortable on both. OK, could have a 'player' here. What a buzz it is to see natural talent like that. Then came the massive punch in the stomach in the conversation that followed...

Tony: "So who do you play for"?
Player: "I don't play for anyone any-more"
Tony: "Ok, (cautious about possible background circumstances) have you ever played for a team or just play for the school team"?
Player: "I did play for (local club) and then I was scouted and went to play for (pro club) but they released me because I  think I messed about and they said I wasn't good enough".
Tony: (deep breath)..."and can you go back and play for the local club"?
Player: "No, I don't play any-more because my mum and dad said I'm not going to be a footballer because I mess about and (pro club) said I'm not good enough anyway"

I dont know where to start on this as it was by far the most upsetting thing iv'e heard in football. Its a hugely disturbing example of the state of our game on so many levels. Of course you would question the parents and seemingly there understanding of taking part in football is for the sole purpose of being a professional footballer. Secondly I have wrote before about the impact we have on players when they are released http://tonymccool.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/when-player-is-released-is-it-all-down.html This player has walked away at 8 years old and decided that not only is his football career is over but his whole football experience at any level is over.
I also think about why he was released. Could naivety and lack of experience not enabled the coaches to see beyond his so called behaviour problem http://tonymccool.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/is-eccentric-sign-of-bad-behaviour.html Was he difficult to handle and the easy option was to let him go?

This lads experience of football at such an early age is an absolute disgrace and it leads me to question if having children of such young age in pro clubs is overall good for our game or in fact damaging long term? Do we have actual proof that have players this young in the pro system actually works? Should we be giving parents early dreams of a superstar footballer son so early?

Maybe all children of KS 1&2 years should remain at local clubs and schools as a rule. This would ensure they simply enjoy football with no pressure. Clubs would then have a big incentive to have good relationships with grass roots and provide coaching workshops ensuring players still get quality development. Then and if they are deemed elite at KS3 parents can choose where they go based on what they have seen and experienced in those early years.

Tony McCool
@antmccool7

Friday, 17 October 2014

Academy Football Coach My Time in My Words

Introduction
In this short ‘book’ I describe my ups and downs at QPR as an Academy Football Coach.
When I left QPR I was overwhelmed by the level of support I got in communications from players, parents and coaches. It truly is a great club and overall I learned a lot and it enhanced my football career without any doubt. But it was mixed with a series of events that is perhaps a sign of the sickness that exists in our game. There can never be any doubt that whatever job you do, whatever club you’re at, it will never be perfect. There will always be the moaners as well. The ones that are never happy. I ran a business and learned that some people are just never happy. But at QPR something very unique was happening. You can do business comparisons but ultimately it’s a football club. A football club with heritage, image, reputation and people. It was in my view that these have been damaged and I tried to communicate that to the people that run the club. It’s easy to say nothing, do what football people call ‘play the game’. But I can’t do it. I can’t pretend things are ok when they are not. I think the impact is bigger and people should know. Football and money are a dangerous combination because they are high on the list of what most people love and love can bring out the worst in some people.


Table of Contents
1-Luton Town to QPR
2-The 1st season
3-The ethos
4-A new start, new investment a new era
5-Aug 2012 The identity and another new Academy Manager
6-Transition in to EPPP
7-Players with ‘Parents’ at the club & Beckham
8-Standard of players
9-Feb 2013 to Resignation
10-A year on 2014/15



1-Luton Town to QPR

Luton Town Academy Coach
I happened to be driving through Holland on my way back from Germany when the car phone rang. “Hi Tony, its Steve Gallen, QPR, how are ya? Is now a good time to talk?” It must have been, because at the end of the conversation I had reached Belgium and a new phone network. I completely hit it off with Steve, of course I knew who he was, he’s someone that is so highly regarded in football. “Tony, I’d like you to come and work at Queens Park Rangers, we will suit your personality and I’ve heard great things about you”.
In football there is no better feeling than feeling wanted. I’d had 8 great years coaching at Luton working up from the community department. But, with things becoming difficult due to the vulnerable position I couldn’t pass up this opportunity. So I went to meet Steve. I got there and went to the old office at Harlington. Immediately there was a great feeling. A great relationship with the scholars was clear as they came into the office having completed their chores and tasks. One of them was of course Raheem and straight away Steve being Steve, was quick to introduce him to me. I sensed a well-grounded, respectful lad, of course I never knew what he would become. “Tone, let’s go for a coffee, Kev Coffee? Birchy, Coffee? We jumped into the van and nipped over to Starbucks.
With the LTFC Squad before Wembley 2009
After a short conversation there and no doubt some banter. I knew this was the club for me. It wasn’t just the banter. It was Steve, when he talks football, its common sense, simple and all focused on the players. I’d been at Luton for many years and coached at every level starting in community football. I’d travelled over Europe with academy teams. I travelled with the first team in the football league and got to work with them in the JPT final at Wembley which certainly was the highlight. I’d learnt so much at Luton and was grateful to those who gave me opportunities and great memories there. I worked hard for the players and have seen some of them develop into good young footballers. But things change and I needed to progress. Football is a small world and like Luton, QPR had an excellent reputation at youth level. So with no talk of money and roles, I gave Steve my word that I was coming.


2-The 1st season

Joined QPR 
QPR’s first team were in the championship and Neil Warnock was the manager. Of course we
would see him in passing but of course we never had anything to do with him. I was initially asked to work with the U14’s and helped Kevin Gallen. Of course I knew Kevin from Luton so that was an easy transition. For those that have come into contact with Kevin they will have experienced the bright enthusiastic bubbly guy that certainly likes a laugh. That was a great thing about training. It was something I always looked forward to. You couldn’t wait to get to work. But I always sensed that perhaps few people knew the other side to him. The dressing room is the so called home for banter, yet for Kevin, what I could see, was the opposite for him. This was work, the place where he transformed into this focused no nonsense individual. Maybe that’s his downfall? Because there are many people that can bluff people with their public persona and steely focus in front of senior influential people. But Kevin only knows how to be himself and transforms when and where it matters. In the dressing room, on the training ground and on the pitch. Only people that know him can empathise with that.
When he was at Luton I recalled he had been sent to train with the youngsters. He was training and was gobsmacked at the lack of application from the young lads. I guess that they too were mistaken by the character that lit the lounge and canteen up with laughter making it a great place to be and thought that was an approach they could bring to the training pitch. They were very mistaken and they were told in no uncertain terms. He gave them a speech which should be given to every single young player. He told them that this was 2/3 hours of a day that was hard work and application compared to most peoples 8-10 hours. So if you can’t dedicate yourself properly to that then you’ve got no chance. They soon livened up.
Of course I wasn’t surprised. I’d seen Kevin in a dressing room before. We were in the Blue Square Conference and things were not going to plan. Luton were away to Cambridge United and it was eventful to say the least. I was aware that as well as fireworks on the pitch there was some ruffled feathers in the stands. Even our non-playing lads were getting some grief in the stands so everyone was a bit pumped. Luton went in at half time 2-0 down with some dubious decisions and we had a man sent off for arguing about them. After Mick had delivered his half time plans and motivation (great man by the way) the lads do what they do, their own time. With emotions boiling over you could sense this could be a difficult second half. Kevin stepped in and the room fell silent. He kept it very simple. “Look lads, all you’ve got to do is do your jobs, I’m up top, I’ll do the job of two people. So, what have you got to complain about? If you all come back in here having done your jobs 100% well be fine” I didn’t let on but I was gobsmacked. No one had an answer to that. I guess inside they thought, well if he’s saying he’ll do two peoples job, what excuse have I got? They returned for the second half full of inspiration and ran out 4-3 winners with Kevin scoring twice.
You see, not many people see this side of Kevin. Working with him then in a development environment at QPR was also a learning curve. No, at that time he didn’t have his badges but was starting. To me I could tell he felt he was home. I could see the relationship with everyone and clearly the staff loved him. He motivated everyone around him. He put smiles on people’s faces and most of all, he was the guy at that level that had the most playing experience yet he had no ego and would talk to everyone. The gateman, the grounds man, the cook, the kit lady Dee were all treated the same as everyone else and he would speak to them all. Dee the kit lady had actually been there when Kevin was a young player and she would recall to me stories of him around the training ground and it was great to see their relaxed open relationship.
In football terms, Kevin was fantastic. He might not have had the top badges at that time but he had the memories and he’s intelligent and so open to learning. I would stand on the side of the pitch and occasionally I would think, I’m not sure here, I’m trying to work out where things were going a bit wrong. Kevin would spot it instantly and I learned so much from that. He also had an amazing relationship with the lads and knew how to develop and challenge players as individuals. He of course also had little bits of high quality advice for strikers and midfielders that just don’t exist in the handbook. Not all ex pros make good coaches but for me, after 8 years in pro football I was happy to admit that I was still learning.



3-The ethos

I’d recalled playing QPR’s youth when I was Luton. Luton were of course strong as they have always been. A great history for producing players but playing QPR was always a challenge. The problem was that whatever you seemingly threw at them they could cope with it. Most of all, they could play and they could play in tight areas, quickly. So when I ended up working there I was fascinated about their training methods and how they approached development. We would have in-service days and Steve Gallen would lead it. All the suggested sessions were delightful and realistic drills relative to the real game. They ensured that players also developed technically and could handle the ball in all situations. There was also competition, something I think too many are scared of. But it was fun and light hearted when required. There was a great sense of player centric development as well. We were very aware that we were there for the players. I recall Steve making comments about words in games that could be deemed critical and we were reminded about the power of confidence.
QPR at that time was clearly a challenging environment top down, actually I wasn’t sure the club really, truly valued the academy but Steve was like the protector. He would take the flack and then smile at the staff and players like nothing was wrong. I recall there being a whole issue over a missing KitKat from the canteen. Academy staff would have restricted access to certain areas, sometimes, no areas and getting the kit washed seemed like you was asking the club to rotate Loftus Road ninety degrees. I know that some clubs like to segregate the 1st team and that’s fine. I’d seen that abroad in Germany. Chelsea have a separate building, Blackburn have a site down the road but QPR didn’t have another site. Even so, it didn’t matter because under Steve, you wanted to be there. Football was great, we were learning, we were working with genuine talent and we felt valued and rewarded. Another example of Steve’s approach was evident when Raheem had returned after his sale to Liverpool. The scholars were all walking, down the road toward the main building. Steve was outside and could see one of the players had his earrings in. “Take your earrings out, your still at QPR and in our tracksuit”, with that, a casually dressed Raheem reached for his ears to take his out. “No, no, not you Raheem, you can do what you like now” Steve said jovially. But this showed the level of respect Raheem had for him.
There could be no doubt that Steve was firefighting. He covered it well and would never mention it but some things were obvious. None more so than the facilities. The main 3G pitch had lighting that was so poor in winter you could barely see the ball and the other playing surface was a short pile hockey pitch of which you would have a third of a pitch and it was so slippy in the cold. But despite that Steve has been successful in bringing through players. None more so than Raheem Stirling, one of Europe’s top targets. But also he has players now playing or played in many teams. Michael Harriman, Michael Doughty, Bruno Andrade, Frankie Sutherland, Max Ahmer, Mo Sherrif, Tafarri Moore, Liam O’Brian, Dean Parrot, Antonio German, Jamie Sandless-White, Michael Petrasso came in late and Reece Cox is now in the 21’s. So despite juggling balls on a roller-coaster, clearly Steve was doing something right. I also believe that at that time QPR had one scout Terry O’Sullivan and the club would not, or could not approve a true budget for a scouting team. Despite that Terry was also instrumental in securing the services of many of those players. This of course a difficult task when you consider the regions competition and clubs with great facilities in comparison. So why did they come to QPR? Because it was a great place to be and had good people. There were good standards, we were expected to look professional, prepare properly, deliver quality sessions and be sure to have plenty of enthusiasm. “Help them” Steve would say and “Always get caught being yourself” A phrase I will never forget, in other words, don’t pretend.
I remember Matt Jackson on talksport was asked how he gets players to Wigan when you consider the competition around him in the North West with huge clubs on his doorstep. His simple answer was “People, were good people”. I think QPR is, or was like that.

4-A new start, new investment a new era

QPR had been promoted to the Premier League and with it came a new chairman. Soon afterwards, there was a new 1st team manager Mark Hughes. We heard there was going to be change and investment in the academy. Quite frankly this was fantastic news. It excited every one. We were invited to a meeting with the new chairman and he was really inspirational with his words. So down to earth. Later he walked over to the training pitches and spoke to the players. It struck me that he was more keen to do this than talk to all the adults trying to grab his attention. This sat really well with me. This was a working class guy that come good and I loved that he wanted to get out in the cold and see the young academy players. As things began to change we also heard about the changes afoot with EPPP being implemented. This all sounded fantastic. Imagine the excitement at being at a club with such grounded people, great football heritage and now investment and positive change. I was invited in to help advise on certain aspects of technology that were required as part of the audit tool on EPPP and I was really excited about where things were heading.
We were asked to attend another meeting. This was non-negotiable, everyone had to be there, there was to be some kind of announcement. There were new people around. We were introduced to a new structure. A guy called Shaun Hallett was introduced as the Academy Manager and Mike Rigg was Technical Director. I had never heard of either of them. The tone of this presentation was in complete stark contrast to the one delivered by the chairman and put everyone on the back foot. This guy in jeans and tweed jacket seemed to have little to smile about wanted to immediately intimidate everyone. The other, Shaun Hallett looked suarve in his open top shirt. He said about his senior background and described his success in making things happen, but he wasn’t from a football background. Mike Rigg got a flipchart out and began his speech which we would later hear repeated several times. These guys were not interested in anyone’s experience, advice or feedback. They were not interested in QPR’s heritage, history or success stories. They were going to deliver a strategy and this was how it’s going to happen. In that presentation I was amazed to hear Mike Riggs description of his background. He gloated that he and his people were responsible for turning Man City around. He described them as a Palace where inside lived a “dysfunctional family”. He claimed that he had managed to fix that and this enabled them to win the league. Some staff member nudged me and said, yeah he also managed to spend nearly £300m in the process. In that meeting we were clearly told some home truths. “Change is going to happen, you will support it and get behind it. If you don’t like it, there’s the door. For everyone of you there are a thousand other people that would jump in your place. You either get on the bus, or get off, it’s your choice”
I remember thinking, hang on pal, you don’t even know us and your throwing threats around. There are good coaches sitting around in this room. I would argue not easy to replace. It was a very naive tactic in my opinion and I for one don’t take kindly to bullying. This guy had attempted to put everyone on the back foot in one swoop. This wasn’t the ‘QPR Way’ I thought. We was also introduced to another guy Glyn Hodges, of course I had heard of him. He would be taking care of football and coaching. All these people would begin to form part of a new team to take the Academy forward. Immediately I thought, hang on, with all the years of firefighting it would have been nice if Steve would have been given the chance to benefit from running it with proper investment.
The next few months was nothing short of turmoil. Steve had disappeared as he had been told he was now solely responsible for the 18’s. Shaun was now in charge. We never really knew what was going on. Very quickly, this had become a very strange place to be. It seemed to me that these people didn’t really know the youth/academy process. Much of that was held together by the football administrator Alan Jacket. On one occasion we turned up to training and on the way to the pitch were told Glyn Hodges is coming to watch training. That for me wasn’t a problem. In all clubs the bosses want to see what’s happening of course. But then another guy was told he had to coach, Paul Bruce. Paul was a great guy. Great people’s person. A great coach. Probably too nice though. I was coaching next to him and he said to me “Tone, I’ve been told I’ve got to coach but it wasn’t my session, he got told to deliver someone else’s session and was given the trialist. All coaches will know that is the worst scenario. Although I can of course do things off the cuff. I like to Plan. Poor Paul was sold down the river. His session broke up and didn’t go down well. Paul was later sent an email by the club to tell him he was getting let go. I was devastated, I know he’s a great coach and person. He was close to players in that Raheem era and you could see the way they went to him. He was there ‘go to’ guy. Yet I felt he had been royally stitched up and not even told face to face or furthermore, not even a phone call.
The rest of that year was horrible and myself and another QPR coach went to share our concerns with Glyn Hodges. We felt that we should tell him to his face. To be fair, he did attempt to appease us at this point. However I later thought this was the wrong move. It seemed every time we arrived at training we would get called into the office and we would get told things that were wrong. But it would never come back from the horse’s mouth. Fear factor was running through the club, it wasn’t nice anymore. We began to feel like we were being attacked and coaches would come to me complaining about so many things. I always said to them “Guys, just remember why we’re here, what would Steve say? Just grit your teeth and don’t rise to the comments. They are trying to destabilise things but let’s just do our jobs, were here to coach for the kids”. So that’s what we did. I remember one guy wanted to quit 3 times that year. What keeps you going though is the players. Once on the pitch we would forget what was going on in the building. We did feel that the guys did seem to lack real experience in handling young developing players. Mainly by the way they communicated with them. Or some cases, they just didn’t, at all.
I do feel that’s its perfectly plausible and understandable that in some cases certain coaches could be in breach of contracts, not coach at the required level, not maintain records as required etc. So in some cases that needs addressing. Even at times people need to change. But this wasn’t the situation here and people were not getting treated equally.




5-Aug 2012 The identity and another new Academy Manager

We had returned to training and we instantly felt on the back foot again like we had before. But now there would be further twists. With the new manager in place the summer had brought much improvement to the training ground in terms of 1st teams facility. Glyn Hodges has a personal relationship with Mark Hughes so actually that should have been of benefit to the Academy. A little in to the return we were hit with some new news. Kevin Gallen had been sacked overnight by email. We were totally gobsmacked. I recall sitting in a back room dressing room with Steve Quashie and Terry O’Sullivan. It was like a bereavement. QPR didn’t feel like QPR anymore. It felt like these guys were determined to remove its identity. Kevin didn’t even get a chance to say cheerio to the lads. Many were so close to him. We didn’t even have a story from them. Just, “erm, he’s gone”.
The next training session I dragged myself through the gate. I really felt that was it. Terry O’Sullivan stopped me walking across the field. “Tone, you ok”? The motivation was gone, I was thinking, what am I going to tell all these players? “I dont think they realise what Kevin means to them”. I said to Terry “its gone Terry, the soul has gone” For the first time in my football life, this felt like a job and a Job I didn’t like anymore.
As I had done to others many times I was talked out of leaving. I thought again about Steve and what he would want. I thought about the players I had helped and that depended on me.
The next twist came with the appearance of Richard Allen. Another person I had not heard of. We were told he had come from Spurs and that he was head of recruitment. He was someone close to Mike Rigg and he brought him in. Within a short time there was some disagreement and we were aware of an atmosphere between these guys. I understand a falling out had happened with Mike Rigg, Glyn Hodges and Shaun Hallett. They would be glaring at each other across the room, mumbling under their breath or sit behind a desk with a face like thunder. You would turn up for work happy and within 10 minutes you could feel the atmosphere and it was depressing. The ironic thing was that this was now the “Dysfunctional Family”.  The outcome of this was that Shaun then disappeared and Richard Allen was announced another, Head of Academy. These became a tight three and later a tight four with Nick Dawes added to mix as 18’s assistant coach. On the ground, I was a mere U14 lead coach and simply got on with my job. Despite the challenges and hurdles we tried to get on with the Job of coaching and developing players.
The usual QPR challenges had increased as always due to the shared site. A new barrier was installed further down the car park and we had to wait for Caroline (1st team secretary) to leave before any of the academy staff were allowed in. So the top car park would be jam packed, we would sit up there embarrassed as staff with all the parents not allowed in till 5.30PM. On one match day the actual front gate was shut and security said we couldn’t come in. I said, “its ok, I work here”. He nervously said, “I know, but she has told me the academy staff are not allowed in”. We had to throw our boots, balls and kit over the fence as we had a game. On another occasion we were completely banned from the whole building and had to get changed in the next field in a Sunday league adult dressing room. That day we played Southampton. Who also were sent there to get changed. This was so embarrassing, a great academy like Southampton and the kids were walking up the main road to get changed. They had to then walk through groups of smoking taxi drivers to the dressing room whilst the parents went in the grubby café for a cup of tea. I changed in the toilet into training kit and made my way back across the adjacent field and through trees back to the training ground to do the warm up. One of the Phase Lead coaches stopped me, he thought he’d been handed the reins of Microsoft and tried to ‘manage’ everyone. I’ve managed many people and put myself on man-management courses. So, I knew that he was severely lacking the skills required, he was miles out of his depth. What an ‘A’ licence doesn’t give you is automatic man-management skills. He tried to be busy to impress the bosses. “Where’s your match day tracksuit”? He said, I replied “It’s in the dressing room where there are naked adults walking around and drawings of a Penis with a sex message underneath it, that the kids pointed out to me when I arrived”. “Why don’t you challenge the real issues instead of trying to look busy in front of the bosses” However despite all the issues, we would go upstairs, say hello to Dee and the cook, Alan the Administrator and the cleaner. I loved the laughs we had. But gradually it seemed any type of communication up there was frowned upon.  We were increasingly rejected by the new group of management and any form of communication was a struggle. “Hello” was a push.
Richard Allen set about bringing in his own staff. In fact, the staff at the academy had grown on a massive scale. He brought in a head of recruitment. Someone that didn’t work there all the time and evidently had been running a boys club Crown and Manor in north London. He was never formally introduced, he just appeared and at one point was walking around the pitches and we didn’t even know who he was. Just a guy in casual clothes and a ruck sack but he was always talking to Richard so we guessed he had that autonomy. He never wore QPR clothes. Something Richard later boasted was something good about him. I wasn’t so sure. I like the idea of professionalism. More staff arrived, one was unconnected to Richard but seven new coaches and a whole team of scouts under Frank were quickly and gradually integrated in different roles in the academy. They mostly had links to working with the crown and manor boys club in north London or Spurs. New people are great but what happened next was a clear divide in staff. I remember being asked to go to a meeting and a table of people were completely new yet they were never introduced. Richard sat with them and they talked and whispered throughout the meeting. Why they were never introduced I don’t know. Terry O’Sullivan was moved into a lesser role and eventually out of the club.
I was really fortunate to be buddied up with a great lad Stephen McCarthy. He works at the club in the community and is a really smashing guy. He was an excellent coach and a great person. Great with the kids to. I also loved that he was ‘QPR’. He knew all the surrounding area and many of the players that came in. I made it clear to him that to me the titled ‘Lead Coach’ meant nothing. Perhaps only that I’ll take the flack for anything that was wrong. But it doesn’t mean he’s here to watch me coach and be my ‘GoFor’ or the ‘BBC’ man. I see that role of one of responsibility to help the assistant coach learn. Its not a threat to me. I want to see him progress. We agreed that we would alternate sessions. That was great because he is a very good coach and very grounded. I actually learned a lot from him to. Later I had another good coach Dean who is young and enthusiastic and so keen to progress. I good lad, hes now moved on. Actually that poor lad was another one that spent a long time preparing for another job that was clearly already assigned to someone else. Another good candidate who was another coach applied but he had his interview moved onto a day that he already said he could not do. Anyway, relationships like this were a great distraction from the traps and banana skins that were be set for us.
Money was being spent on advertisement boards and booklets. Actually I have to commend the investment in medical and S&C. To me that was class! We were also going through the transition to EPPP and these people I felt had interpreted it badly. They weren’t player centric. To me they were too ruthless. Richard Allen was unapproachable, there were clicky gangs, people felt nervous. There was serious doubt about the integrity of the whole thing. Most of all, I was uncomfortable about the way these guys handled the players. To me that lacked experience in that department and most of all empathy. These are young human beings not puppy greyhounds. I cringed at the way some of the players were treated and spoken to.
We had a big meeting about everything academy. Everyone was there. Including the now brave faced Steve. Who by the way never said one negative word about any person or what had happened to him.  In that meeting they spoke about how they were going to recruit players and how to handle real talent. I remember thinking, hang on, Fitz is in the room and he coached Raheem Stirling. Steve is in the room and he coached him more than anyone and overseen his development. At the time if you went on the Premier League youth website Raheem was the image you were presented with. The flagship example. They never once asked them two guys to stand up. Ask them what they thought, did they have anything they could share that we could learn from? It’s like they’re scared to admit that before all this money, something great happened, before you got here under difficult ownership, the club had success. Instead we are now being presented to by people who, with respect, have a fraction or no experience. Later an email was circulated saying we are going to ‘smash the perception that QPR only recruits posh players from Surrey’. This was a ludicrous statement. Raheem and probably 90% of the original players were not ‘Posh kids from Surrey’. Even so, if there was a ‘posh kid from surrey’, that was class, should he not be recruited? These attacks were unjustified and continued through the year. I was accused of not giving trialist a chance, was another example. In response I wrote a correspondence to Richard Allen. This was an absolute insult to me. I always want to give people a chance, but also want to give the lads already there the best chance. I felt this was more about making way for lads that affect the percentage of players brought in to make the reports look better. For me, I’ve got too much integrity for that. This formed one of the biggest issues I had. How can you sleep at night signing a player who you know will not make the grade? You’re taking him out of school, giving him a dream, his parents and family are over the moon. But you know he won’t make it, but it makes your numbers look better and bonuses start flowing.
For me I will not bend on this. If I was in charge of an academy I would be clear. When I look a player in the eye and tell him were signing him, it will be because I think he has a genuine chance. I’m taking you out of school which has a lifetime impact on you. When I look the parents in the eye it’s because I genuinely think he has a chance and I will care for him and be honest with him. We owe that to you the parents. I certainly won’t do it to meet my performance targets and my bonus. If I don’t meet them, I’ll explain to the chairman, ‘that’s because I want a player for the first team’. Not a short term fix by way of a spreadsheets and percentages. I can’t live with myself by bluffing you to keep my salary because I might destroy people’s lives in the process. If a player signs for me he’ll have earned it. If the chairman can’t live with that, sack me. Yet this club now seems to be jumping in with both feet with players who for me, are not at the level required.


6-Transition in to EPPP

Whilst the club embarked on EPPP it seemed that it had become obsessed with the data instead of the pitch. I’m actually behind many of the EPPP principles but at QPR it had focussed all around the data entry. But the quality on the pitch was failing. Both players and the coaching. The players coming in and signed (not all) but many were in my view unfairly signed. I say unfairly because of the effect long term. The coaching had also declined. We had a ‘skills coach’ who was meant to do a session on Saturdays. He would turn up late, take random players un prepared, then I’d watch and he was doing passing and receiving. I’d think, this guy is making it up as he goes along. They began to squeeze more and more hours in to the lads to meet EPPP requirements for level 2 but everyone and the players are part-time. The players were tired and they no longer had smiles on their faces. We had put in a new philosophy but I think the players were confused. There didn’t seem to be any consistency. For example, a player (now signed at another club U18) was told to improve his range of pass in a 6 week report meeting. It was all too ‘sideways and backwards’. The next week I watched him train as two age groups got together and played a game. He hit a 40 yard raking diagonal pass that the other full back missed and his winger brought down with his chest. If Paul Scholes hit that pass the MOTD team would be raving about it. The game was immediately stopped and he had strips tore off him. “That pass was too risky, the full back could have got that”. This was also a lad accused of having anger issues, is it any wonder?
I was now dreading coming to training. The ego on people was now off the scale. Some staff just refused to talk to you. They actually didn’t even talk to the players. I walked upstairs to the restaurant before training on one occasion and Glyn Hodges and Richard Allen were sitting on the sofa. As I walked around the corner, instead of saying Hi, they both got up and walked off. This was a regular thing I experienced. Another coach who was sitting there and seen what happened. He said to me, “Did that really just happen”? I said to him. “Don’t worry, I’m used to it now”. I just smiled. One thing I always tried to do was smile through it and laugh. In some ways it gave me comfort to know that whatever they chucked at me I could still smile and be happy. That also helped put me in the right frame of mind for coaching. There is nothing worse than watching a coach that’s had a bad day taking his or her mood on to the pitch. I see that in teachers as well and its such an ugly unfair appearance.
But every time I turned up for work they would find a way to have a dig. It was becoming a real drain. It wasn’t “Hello” or “How are you”. It was “Right, this is a problem, we need to look at”. The thing is, we as coaches were trying our best to accommodate change. Mainly under the EPPP transition. We were all working now seven days a week with the extra reporting and sessions. We were not offered any extra money but we were also not offered any thanks. I felt that we were steamrolling ahead and not considering the wellbeing of the players in the process. This was clear to me on many occasions. One lad was training on the ‘hockey’ pitch. A surface we were never satisfied with, especially for a ‘level 2’ academy. We always feared injury and one evening it happened. A lad went down with a what we thought could be a broken ankle. As coaches we all steamed into action. Coaches from various age groups quickly rallied and we called for medical. We catered for the surrounding areas, helped the medical team and ensured the safe swift care of the boy. The next coaching session we were called upstairs to a meeting before training. Something that had become a constant drain as we knew this was a moan time before we even got on to the pitch. The subject of the lad’s injury was the topic. We were told that Richard Allen was not happy that he didn’t know till later. I said to the so called Phase lead coach “If you think I’m going to call the head of academy before I call for medical help or an ambulance you can forget it. He’s more concerned about being embarrassed and losing face than the welfare of the child? At no point in this meeting have you actually said how the lad is, or what we did was good or what could we have done better”. These examples were mounting and we were completely disillusioned. To be an Academy coach you must have enjoyment your-self. You have to love what you do because lets be fair, this job with new EPPP requirements had become a £1.74 per hour job. So, you have to love what you do, yet we were under constant attack. We were only ever communicated to in a negative way. At the time I wasn’t sure whether this was vindictive or simply naivety in management of people from these new staff who simply lacked leadership experience.
Having said that, you don’t need experience to just be civil and polite to people. If I ignore someone I am really conscious of doing that and makes me extremely uneasy, I can’t do it. Yet these people had it down to a tee. Or perhaps it was just the way they are as personalities? Myself and another Coach again decided that we would approach them. We asked for a meeting to discuss issues and we met Richard Allen and Glyn Hodges. I was actually surprised at Richard Allen. He listened and actually said he was also learning and would try to change. He acknowledged my remarks about scouts being at games and no-one knows who they are. Glyn didn’t really speak, I had the feeling he actually just wanted to throw me out the window. The EPPP was looming so a piece of me thought that Richard was simply buying time and didn’t need a mass walk out. Either way, in my mind, I always thought about what Steve would want. Although we didn’t have contact with him anymore he would want us to do what’s best for the players and QPR. Not for these people or even ourselves. I then bumped into Marc Bircham in the car park and he echoed my thoughts. “Tell all the coaches to forget what these guys are doing and get them to pull together for QPR”. So, I cascaded a message around the staff. “C’mon guys, let’s do everything we can to get the club through the audit”. My view was there are so many issues at the club that could be uncovered. What I don’t want, is the club failing the EPPP on my behalf. Despite what they were doing to us I won’t let them pin that on me. So I set about spending every spare minute I had making sure all the PMA (Premier League Data and record system) was up to date and that all our coaching and records were tip top. On the day of the audit I had planned everything perfectly. The match preparation was spot on. In the game I ensured the auditors listened to my team talk to ensure they heard me deliver the clubs ‘philosophy’. All the coaches did the same, we all pulled together for QPR. In fact the strange thing was, on that day everything was professional. It was like living with an abusive family that had guests. Because all these people that had completely disregarded us and bullied us were now smiling, laughing and talking to us. Someone asked me how it went. I said, “Yes it was great, but why can’t it be like this every week”? I just don’t know why these people could not be straight with people, be nice. I had run companies before and I know that being nice to people gets you so much more in return. These guys were seemingly disregarding anyone that was a previous member of staff. We never got any formal feedback after EPPP audit. No thanks either.
I’ve been to many clubs training grounds over the years and I pick up on everything. For example I remember being in reception at Carrington and seeing first-hand the level of respect Ryan Giggs had for the receptionist. So, it’s not all about scale, size and structure. Clearly some clubs clearly have a people philosophy as well as a playing philosophy.
On match days in the Academy every club has a ‘host’. Someone who shows people where to go, gets people tea etc. QPR have a guy called Steve Bacon. (I renamed him Mr Bacon to show respect) He is a lifetime fan of the club. When we travelled abroad to tournaments he would ask me to bring back any programs for him and I always did. He’s also someone that had undergone major surgery and a top man. I ensured all my players shook his hand and said hello to him. Also the kit lady Dee, “say hello to her, this lady washes all your grubby kits, don’t ignore her”. After a game I would make sure we would clean the dressing room, why should we leave it all for him to sort out? Because it’s his job? Hang on, show this guy some respect. When you get off the bus, say thanks to the driver, yes he’s doing a job, but he’s a human being. This guy Mr Bacon would trudge across 3 pitches in wind and rain just to get someone a cup of tea. I seen him there in this rubbish old QPR jacket that didn’t even zip up. I asked him “Mr Bacon, where’s your new jacket”? “Its ok Tone, I asked but they said no, they haven’t got any”. I was shocked, hang on, there is a container 50 yards over there which is stacked to the roof with kit. Including jackets, even last seasons. Why not give the guy a comfortable jacket. He’s served the club so well. We should put people like him in front of all the staff, players and parents and give him a thank you card a signed shirt and a round of applause. No, no longer at QPR. We don’t even keep him warm and ignore him. This isn’t football as I know it. I said I would bring him something from home but then I think Terry O’Sullivan had heard and gave him his own Jacket.




7-Players with ‘Parents’ at the club & Beckham

My lad was a signed player at QPR but believe me he was not shown any favours. I never asked for any either. In fact in the end I asked for him to be released as I knew that despite all the positive comments from people, he was regular skipper and I’d had top football people say good things. But I knew he would never stand a chance here because of who he was. I also wanted him to get a proper education then come back to football at a club that doesn’t have the politics and issues. I wasn’t the only person to have a son at the club. There were several key people. Without talking about players individually, some I would say had a chance, some perhaps didn’t but, these players have all in some way been targeted by this management team. What I never understood is, why could they not show these people respect? If you’ve got Gerry Francis around, I think, if you’ve got an issue, you ask him to come into the office and you speak to him face to face about his boy. Surely he deserves that? Instead they deliberately set about getting all these players out. But there is a ‘way’. I think this was fear. Fear of these peoples calibre that were walking around and in some cases like Gerry Francis, an absolute legend as a QPR player/manager and someone connected with proper football people at the highest level. Was that why they targeted Kevin Gallen as well? To me, like Kevin, I wanted to learn from Gerry. To me he was a lovely approachable guy. Again, no ego. I can only learn from this guy. I would call him and he never once rejected my call. He also never tried to ‘interfere’. He would always be in the background but I knew I could approach him whenever I wanted and he was always a delight to speak to. Yet others ignored him and in my view handled the situation with his son appallingly. Marc Bircham had two lads there and of course Marc is a big character. Again, not handled well and not shown the respect he deserved. At every training session we had Dennis Wise there watching. Again I was amazed. Have we asked this guy to get involved? Maybe would he even talk to the kids? But to me he was just rejected. I can only think this was fear of who he was. To me it was the opposite. Again he was approachable, always polite, smiling and happy to talk football. Often he would share some views about development and what he felt would help. I enjoyed picking his brain. When I was at Luton I used to sit on the bus opposite Dimitri Kharine. As well as stories about his pregnant hamster he also occasionally came out with words of wisdom. Especially sitting on the bench. He might be a goalkeeper but he would spot things. He was always peeling an orange and whilst doing that he would nudge me and just say “That’s a problem”. He’d spot things.
I don’t see why people see that as a threat. When I was in business I wanted to surround my self with the highest calibre people as possible. I didn’t see that as a threat to my position. Also, these people, me included never asked for any special favours. I didn’t need any, my lad could have gone elsewhere but as I was at QPR it was of course convenient and he had been exposed to Steve Gallen’s training. But football is about opinions, if genuine, the least we could expect would be people to be straight with you? I think we all deserved that.
I was told David Beckham’s son was coming in. People might not believe me but I really wasn’t bothered. The guy that rang me was like a star struck school kid but to me, he’s just another player. I was asked by a reporter in the street who stopped my car if I was his coach. I read the script. “Look, the answer is yes, but that is as far as it goes. The only people I will talk about Brooklyn to will be the club officials and his parents. That’s no different to the rest of the lads in my squad”. But seeing the change of behaviour in people makes me cringe. I don’t know what it is in me that doesn’t really do the star thing. Brooklyn to me was just another player and I tried to integrate him and make him feel relaxed about playing and training with us. Plus Ive got kids his age, I take responsibility for the affect we have on all the kids and have empathy for their emotions. Maybe that’s the parent in me. Occasionally his Dad would turn up to watch. To me, a humble polite guy. Why wouldn’t he be I guess. I actually was really gutted though on one occasion when it turned into a bit of a circus. I think that lacked class. I think I would have got each coach to speak to the players about the situation. My lads were guided by the way I treated Brooklyn and therefore they did the same. But seeing QPR lads in kit rush around David for photos and autographs disappointed me. Maybe that’s me being harsh. But a football training ground should be a leveller for stars and we are taking these players down that road. They should be happy in the company of former top players and household names. Maybe show him the respect he deserves, offer to shake his hand and say hi. I’d seen that behaviour in Germanys in academies. Maybe then he could have walked across the pitch and shared some wisdom.
Later in this episode I’d turned up to training as normal. When I arrived I was told I had to go upstairs. “Why”? I was told I had to catch up on the PMA system as they needed it done by the next day. I was not convinced by this but as always I just did as I was told. Although, why not tell me that earlier because I’ve wasted 2 hours on the road getting here and that could be 2 hours extra working I could have had at home. I text my coaching partner Dean and asked if he was here and to pop and see me so I can talk about the session only for him to appear upstairs. “What are you doing here? Who’s coaching and looking after the kids?” He told me he also had been sent upstairs to do PMA. I was shocked and asked well who’s coaching? He said Glyn and other senior staff were taking it. This was a surprise as this had never happened before. I looked out the window and could see the senior guys now delivering a high tempo session next to the car park. Within 10’ I recognised one of the cars facing the session. David Beckham’s.



8-Standard of players

I would never speak openly about individual players but overall the standard was pretty good. I had however tried to bring a player in. A lad that had broken goal scoring records in local football. But it was blocked, he has now signed elsewhere. Yet other players being brought in were in my view, overall not at the level required. That’s not to say never, but most should be at a development centre stepping stone being prepared. But I was being forced to play players and I had no control. I was worried for some of the existing players because I felt some were far better but like the staff, they seemed to be squeezed out to get numbers in that looks better on a report. Under my direction we had gone to level 1 academies West Ham and Spurs and won. (Spurs may have fielded many younger players) Of course that is not the main development criteria. But at 14 upwards its reality. There is nothing wrong in my view with wanting to win. This is going to be your livelihood and one which is dependent on results. We weren’t smashing the ball up the pitch. We had played well in tight areas and won against two excellent academies. Later and not long before I gave up, we went to Arsenal. In this game my hand was forced. I was told I had to bring and play certain trialist despite me saying openly they were not ready. Also, Arsenal was not the place for their first game. I went and did as I was asked and tried as always to set up professionally. I’d noticed a group of people behind the goal. These were a group of the new scouts. To me, why were they there? Surely on a Sunday morning they should be out scouting? The jigsaw started to come together and I could see why I was told to bring these players. It was a complete disaster. We were miles off that level and conceded 24 goals. In 18 years coaching I have never been so humiliated and my heart went out to the guys. Registered and non-registered. They were completely destroyed. This wasn’t because we were trying to play out from the back so a development learning objective or some other key learning experience. We had destroyed the confidence of those boys and we engineered it. We set them up for failure. The year before I had matched Arsenal and they scored late on to win 2-1 and the year before that at 14’s was a 4-2 win and a draw. We now were on a level of a grass roots result. A cricket score you expect if Man Utd played a Sunday team. During the game Arsenal were also ruthless, they never let up and the coach was still pushing right to the end. Is he wrong? After the game Nick Dawes spoke to the lads. “I know we got beat lads, but look how far we’ve come”. These lads might be 14 but they are not stupid. He should have apologised for exposing them to that situation. What could they have possibly gained from it?
At the earlier Spurs game I was accused of not taking trialist to the game. However, I told this massive group of players that we would decide on the Saturday morning who to take. Several of the trialist had not turned up and made no contact. What does it tell you about a player if he knows he could potential play spurs at that great facility yet doesn’t turn up on the Saturday and doesn’t call or text? There was no way I was going to chase them. Yet I was told I was wrong and I wasn’t happy about that. These were low standards and messages to send to players. I always like to set good standards and the lads must show the drive and hunger. Being a top athlete isn’t a stroll. Im also very sympathetic to background issues and restrictions. This wasn’t the case here.
Since then it is my opinion that the lads are so low on confidence overall and I’m not convinced players are signed with the right motive. I think this can be seen in the current 18’s squad. Those poor guys are now paying the price of this episode. What surprised me with that was how they were selected. Steve Gallen has something like 5 wins in 7 seasons at youth alliance level with many players now earning a living. He has since gone on to get the 21’s doing well when you consider what they are up against. But last year I seen Steve and tripped him by asking about his involvement in selecting the scholars. It’s to my knowledge that Steve was not asked one question about his opinion of who should be signed. I find that absolutely shocking that you could have that experience on the payroll and not deem his opinion of value. But coaches with 1 year experience, recent community coaches, skills coaches and guys from a community boys club are asked. If I was in charge, yes I have my view, but I would embrace all the knowledge I had at my disposal.

9-Feb 2013 to Resignation

I wrote to the management team. I asked to meet them about the comment made to me about not integrating trialist. This was such an insult. Ask any coach that worked with me what I did to make them feel welcome in a nerve racking environment. I also had no incentive not to welcome them. This was more about them wanting me to just agree about certain players in order for them to sign them. I will never do that. I have to be honest. But I know my place, I would of course work my hardest with whatever players are standing in front of me. We had one lad train with us and that night the floodlights failed. In that short time they had seen enough and took him upstairs and signed him. I questioned it and was told. Yes, but it makes the numbers look better in an audit. We are taking this lad out of school? Giving him a dream, to make numbers look better for us? That doesn’t sit well with me and I wrote to the club and told them. I was also concerned about the way in which we were releasing players. Not a nice process and some parents of course get confrontational and at times we get it wrong. I accept that. But this was always something I took seriously. Shattering a young person’s dreams is not something I enjoy one bit. Now the process was being disregarded. This was a rare occasion where you won’t find me laughing and joking but ironically, others were. I wondered if they actually cared. Some even seem to enjoy it, like it was an expression of power.
I wrote again to the club in March 2013. It was again fed back to me that the recruitment guy had a meeting with foundation coaches and made detrimental comments about the U14’s. This was an ongoing thing but I was convinced they were trying to get me out of the club to make way for others. I also asked for commitment about next season as of course, I could start to look for a new club.
I’d returned in the summer of 2013 and things were worse than ever. It was clear now that my son was now being targeted by the club. Richard Allen had never spoken two words to him so he was also ignored. So we asked for him to be released. On this occasion they agreed instantly. After that he played for QPR, skipper again.  He walked off the pitch late on having been subbed and went to shake the coaches’ hand and the coach turned his back on him. If he had spat at an opponent, kicked someone in the face or told the Ref to F*ck off, I could understand that. But instead he had run his heart out as always. That was the final straw. I then resigned on November 17th. I couldn’t take the childish behaviour anymore. I told them that if they had just released my lad in the professional way as they just didn’t want him that would have been fine. Instead they kept him on and tortured him to get to me. He was in the top 4 physically, had lots of positive comments from ex pros, including a superstar in Europe. He attended every training session and applied himself, he always gave everything and that was other people talking. Yet his coach never said “well done” in one whole year! The only conclusion was that he was targeted to affect his Dad. Yet what did his dad do wrong? What did so many of the staff do wrong? I told them not to hang my resignation on the ‘disgruntled parent’ hook. I had already asked my lad to be released twice. Also, we wanted him to go back to school. The other peg to go for would be ‘doesn’t like change’. This would be ridiculous. I work in change. I wanted things to be better. Better people and better facilities. If I was a taxi driver with a Vauxhall Chevette would I turn down the offer of a new Mercedes? Of course not, but the downside would be this Mercedes would contain some of the biggest Ego’s you could come across and every time your backs turned they will be filing the brake pipes. In that scenario I would tell you to keep your Mercedes. I detailed in my letter that I was unhappy with the way they disregarded the impact they were having on children’s lives. If I was in charge my first question on the evaluation should be “Did I make the kids smile tonight”? What I could see was children that had become miserable and under so much pressure it was uncomfortable to watch and I didn’t want to be part of it anymore. Near the end I watched a 16s game against Bristol Rovers. QPR had 12 staff in or around the dugout. Bristol had 3 and were the better team and ran out winners. I’d seen the same group go to Brentford, they were set up for failure. I really felt for the guys, they were devoid of all confidence and belief.
The next day after resigning I wrote a separate email to the chairman. I told the chairman what was happening. I even told him that after Kevin Gallens treatment he had re-applied for another job. He got asked to come to an interview and deliver a session. Someone else also came and he was also excellent. The lads coached told me and said they were both excellent. After that he was told he didn’t get the job, it was awarded to Nick Dawes, who never delivered a demo session. I don’t think he had an interview either. So why put Kevin through it? Or the other guy? They later said he didn’t have an A licence, well don’t you cross that off the list before you bring him in and humiliate him for a job already clearly assigned to someone else? Is that the way you treat your former servants? Was Nikki Butt treated like that at Man Utd? Is that the way to treat anybody?
I heard back from the Chief Executive Philip Beard who requested to meet me. I had a three page document with bullet points of what had gone on. I didn’t need them. The meeting went well and I truly believed that he was going to act on it. I suggested he speak to staff. Ask them how things are. Tell them there is no retribution. He thanked me and asked me to meet Richard Allen. That was arranged and I again went to Loftus Road and I told Richard to his face with Mark Donnely. Again, that meeting went well and I was convinced that things would get better for the players and staff. I’d sacrificed myself but maybe the young lads would now get a better chance. I also met separately with HR and told her very openly about what was going on.
However as we approach nearly a year later things have been still very strained. I have wrote a lot about EPPP and the affects but I guess much of this was the way QPR interpreted it. A lot of people have been very badly treated, good people as well. I wrote to the Chairman again in April to tell him how frustrated I was that nothing has really changed, possibly got worse. I actually believed I could solve issues for QPR. I would rid the club of ego and bullshit. Go back to the core values of QPR but with added facilities and structure. I’d make sure players ‘wanted’ to come to QPR because as well as great facilities, we have great people. I believe firmly that you can have a modern club, modern facilities, modern thinking, work within EPPP guidelines but also players and staff that can also enjoy the process. My vision would be to imagine players desperate to get to training because they love it. Staff desperate to get there because it’s so rewarding.  I offered to speak to him privately but he never replied.
Since then I see Richard Allen is moving to the FA to join Mike Rigg. To me that is like the abuser’s joining the social services or the police. This perhaps is systematic of our games downfall. This is the organisation telling us all how to do it. Glyn Hodges has re-joined Mark Hughes and Nick Dawes has left to head back north. So it’s time to sift through the wreckage I guess and look for survivors.
If it were me I would start my process of hiring with good people. That is the core of everything and the greatest thing about kids is, like animals they are rubbish at lies. When you try to be nice to them just because people are watching, you can see it in their eyes. Just like a dog, if he doesn’t like you, you’ll know about it. This was evident at QPR in that spell.




10-A year on 2014/15

Now I see again QPR have took another massive swing to another set of leaders. The good thing I can see is that these are ‘football people’. I don’t know Les Ferdinand from Adam so of course I have no view of him but I have certainly heard great things about his colleague Chris Ramsay. I sincerely hope these guys set about re instating a player centric Academy and I’m sure they will spot the bluffers and move them on, saving QPR from yet another whirlwind. The first of its kind to reach a youth level.
From the chairman’s perspective, I hope he realises that PowerPoint and Posters don’t produce players. Good People do and some of them are, and were right under his nose at a fraction of the cost. I can only judge things based on what I have seen and to me the Chairman was a good man. Mostly in football these guys have a thankless task. Only one team can win the league and the rest fight for the scraps & survival. I genuinely believe that Mr Fernandes has good intentions but he won’t like me saying that many believe (me included) that he has had his pants pulled down. It’s time for him to wade through the arse kissers and look for real solid good ‘people’ that can properly cement the future of QPR. They might be the guys at the back of the room, not up front. I think he and the club also need to place a great deal more importance on individuals that are coaching in the academy. Maybe the whole of football does? Let’s face it, a phase lead coaches salary is ridiculously low and in some clubs you can clearly see that you get what you pay for. A part-time coach is on less than the minimum wage. That can’t be right? The most important asset of a football club is its players. Unless you simply decide to throw money away, you simply go buy them but for a club like QPR a free spending chairman is no longer the solution with the FFP rules. So to me that means the academy players must be high on the list of the most important assets of the club? Who is closest to them? Who has most contact with them? Who therefore has the most influence on their development? So, surely you would take care who you afford this responsibility to. You would then reward them and make them feel valued. I certainly don’t think that means anyone of a thousand people could just jump into the role. Its not McDonalds or a factory floor pressing buttons.
The FA
I’m now doing a bit of coaching and scouting for someone that has recognised my abilities in the past. I know there are great clubs out there and also great people. I’ve experienced both ends of the spectrum. Like most, football is my passion. A football pitch is where I’m most at home. But the game sometimes frustrates me. Top down and bottom up. I see all these variations of courses the FA deliver, many great ones but what good are they if the guy who sits at the front writing notes all the way through then is the guy shouting abuse at a player? It’s like getting your driving licence. That doesn’t automatically make you a good driver and many abuse the roads and disregard safety.
 As a governing body the FA needs to start leading by example. Pound for pound it has to be one of the globes most underperforming organisations. Yes, its taken strides in grass roots recently and many courses are valuable. It’s trying to combat bottom up issues and to me those changes look good. But top down it’s a disaster. We have no synergy or consistency. I listen to many debates about the problems and then we talk about Germany, how they do it, before it was Spain and Tikka Takka. Before that it was Brazil.
The FA needs to be more humble, a failing schools leaders don’t go round other schools advising. The achieving schools leaders do. If putting an England badge on your chest makes you think you’re at the pinnacle of your career and everyone admires you than your wrong. But it does mean you’ve got responsibility. You’re working for our governing body top down and you should lead by example. So please, hoof your Ego over the hedge and roll your sleeves up. I’ve met some great people in the FA like Rob Munroe, a real guy, real knowledge, real personality, no ego. We need more of him.
To me football is simple. I see Scotland doing better at the moment and I think, have they instantly improved the development process? Have the players they had suddenly got better? Or do they have an enjoyable environment with togetherness and confidence? That’s what Gordon Strachan brings. ‘It’s ok to enjoy football and your surrounding’s at any level’ that’s why I would take the young crop to the Euro’s. Let them practice 3/4/5 games together and get to know each other better. Elsewhere, further down in the FA I would set about internal presentations about EGO. What does it look like and how can we rid it from our development game. I would go to clubs at all levels, with a BLANK presentation and ask them all what they think of the FA and fill it in. Let them guide the future of the FA. After all, like the BBC or the NHS. TheFA is the Peoples. It should be called, The PEOPLES FA. It belongs to the football community. I would embark on clear and balanced recruitment policies to ensure we have the right values attached to the right talent. I would look at the coaching certificates and investigate in depth why the cost is somewhere near 10 times the cost of the same qualification elsewhere in Western Europe. Finally, I would pat Nick Levett on the back and ensure he has a good team to advance development of grass roots but assist in supporting people from all backgrounds to participate in football. 3G pitches look great. The kids with no money can benefit from rebound practice off the 12’ fence. They need access to them.
My criteria for any coach delivering football or fiitball for us is simple. Knowledge, yes we need knowledge, quality learning and development. But every session remember our 4xE’s.
Enjoyment, Enthusiasm, Empathy and Energy.
 That is the cornerstone to simply enable the knowledge to be shared and delivered.  

Tony McCool
@antmccool7